Home › Articles › Investment › CAGR vs Simple Average Growth: Why 80% Growth Over 5 Years Is Not 16% CAGR

CAGR vs Simple Average Growth: Why 80% Growth Over 5 Years Is Not 16% CAGR

If a value grows by 80% over 5 years, it is tempting to say it grew 16% a year. That figure is the total growth divided by the years, and it is not the compound annual growth rate. This guide works through one example to show why the two differ and what the CAGR actually measures. It describes two values and a period; it is not a forecast.

A start block beside two end blocks of the same height: one built from the start plus five equal slices, the other from the start plus five slices that each grow larger

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

  • ₹1,00,000 growing to ₹1,80,000 over 5 years is 80.00% total growth.
  • Dividing 80.00% by 5 gives 16.00% a year. This calculator calls that the simple yearly average: total growth divided by the years, and nothing more.
  • The compound annual growth rate is about 12.47%: the equal yearly rate that, compounded for 5 years, connects ₹1,00,000 to ₹1,80,000.
  • Compounding 16% a year for 5 years would reach ₹2,10,034, well above ₹1,80,000, so 16% is not the compounded rate.
  • CAGR assumes one starting value and one ending value with nothing added or withdrawn. A past CAGR is not a forecast.

1. Total Growth and the Simple Yearly Average

Take a starting value of ₹1,00,000 and an ending value of ₹1,80,000 after 5 years. The total growth is ₹80,000 on ₹1,00,000, or 80.00%.

Dividing the total growth by the number of years gives 16.00% a year. In this calculator that figure is called the simple yearly average: the total growth divided by the years. It is easy to compute, but it treats the growth as if the same ₹16,000 were added each year.

2. What CAGR Asks

The compound annual growth rate asks a different question: what single yearly rate, compounded each year, would turn ₹1,00,000 into ₹1,80,000 over 5 years?

The answer is about 12.47% a year. Applied to ₹1,00,000, that is about ₹12,475 of growth in the first year. Each later year grows from a larger base.

3. Why the Two Differ

The simple yearly average spreads the total growth into five equal parts of ₹16,000, each measured against the original ₹1,00,000. Nothing compounds, so every year adds the same amount.

Compounding works differently. Each year's growth is a share of the value the year before, so the rupee amounts rise: about ₹12,475 in the first year and about ₹19,964 in the fifth. Both routes end at ₹1,80,000, but the compounded one needs a lower rate to get there.

These yearly amounts are a mathematical construction that connects the two values. They are not recorded yearly results, and the value did not necessarily grow smoothly each year.

To see that 16% is not the compounded rate, compound it: ₹1,00,000 growing at 16% a year for 5 years reaches about ₹2,10,034, not ₹1,80,000.

4. How the Gap Behaves

For growth over more than one year, the simple yearly average is higher than the CAGR, and the gap widens as the period gets longer or the total growth gets larger. Here the difference is 16.00% less 12.47%, about 3.53 percentage points.

The two figures agree only when there is no growth, or when the period is exactly one year.

5. What This Does Not Tell You

CAGR assumes one starting value and one ending value, with no money added or withdrawn in between. It is the constant yearly rate that would connect them. The actual year-by-year path may have been very different, and a past CAGR does not mean the same rate will happen again.

Regular investing, such as a SIP, is not a lump sum, so CAGR does not suit it. Fees, tax, inflation and dividends not already in the ending value are not included. This is arithmetic on the numbers you enter, not a forecast or advice.

Example: ₹1,00,000 to ₹1,80,000 Over 5 Years

Total growth: 80.00%. Growth multiple: 1.80×. Simple yearly average: 16.00%. CAGR: about 12.47%.

Compounded at the CAGR, the first year adds about ₹12,475 and the fifth about ₹19,964. Compounding 16% for 5 years would reach about ₹2,10,034.

The Bigger Picture

Total growth tells you how much a value changed. The CAGR tells you the equal yearly rate that would connect the two values. Dividing the first by the number of years is a shortcut that overstates the second.

Before You Decide

Things to Consider

  • Do not divide the total growth by the years and call it the yearly rate.
  • Read the CAGR as the equal compounded yearly rate between two values.
  • Remember that a past CAGR is not a forecast.
  • Remember that CAGR does not suit money added or withdrawn along the way.
ToolZen Hub Calculator

Try the CAGR Calculator

Enter a starting value, an ending value and a period to see the CAGR next to the total growth, the growth multiple and the simple yearly average.

Open the Calculator

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the CAGR lower than the total growth divided by the years?

Dividing by the years spreads the growth evenly without compounding. The CAGR is the equal yearly rate that compounds to the same ending value, and that rate is lower than the simple division.

Is the simple yearly average an average of yearly returns?

No. In this calculator it is only the total growth divided by the number of years. It is not built from any yearly figures, because the calculator takes none.

Does a CAGR mean the value grew by that much every year?

No. It is the constant yearly rate that would connect the two values. The actual year-by-year growth may have been quite different.

How were the figures calculated?

With the CAGR Calculator, using a starting value of ₹1,00,000, an ending value of ₹1,80,000 and a period of 5 years. You can reproduce them by entering the same values.

Continue Reading

Related Articles

Explore more practical guides from ToolZen Hub.

Two chains of yearly steps along one ruler of years: a row of five larger steps and a longer row of nine slightly smaller steps
Finance

Comparing Two Investments Over Different Periods: A Bigger Gain Is Not a Higher Yearly Rate

Read article →
Chart of the total invested, a dashed line, against the estimated value, a solid line, over 15 years, with the gap between them widening
Investment

How a SIP Grows: Your Investment vs Estimated Growth

Read article →